No, I see the problem though, 'rural' dictionary, 'aussie' dictionary perhaps?
Looks like the stage is set to reject any change: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-05-17/w ... st/5459444
(edit: hi pteropus)
Nuts wrote:(edit: hi pteropus)
Email sent.stepbystep wrote:Logic and common sense would always lead to this however things are only just beginning to heat up. The lobbyists are working hard at UNESCO.
The Australian government through DFAT are attempting to sway poorer countries with a vested interest in having their own WHA's delisted such as Malaysia, Vietnam, Peru, Phillipines, Turkey, Japan, Korea and others to vote for the delisting as it will set a precedent they can follow. There are 21 member states on the committee. DFAT are also very keen to tie a members vote to influence in regards to membership of the TPP(Trans Pacific Partnership), do some reading on the ramifications of that little deal if you want your socks scared off.
In addition to this pressure the IPA(Institute of Public Affairs), right wing 'think tank' and unofficial Liberal party policy machine is also in their lobbying each member. The IPA is funded by some of the worlds biggest miners, forestry companies, pharmaceutical companies etc etc etc. The Guardian at least had the stones to publish a little of that.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/m ... -delisting
So what can you do?
This. Personalise it a bit if you can and hope there are more member countries with conscience than without. It's a really big deal about a lot more than 74,000ha of our beautiful forests.
http://envirotas.good.do/DefendTasWilde ... committee/
UNESCO will make their decision mid June.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests