Moondog55 wrote:I've always tried to increase the OUT so I could eat what I wanted
Mark F wrote:Moondog55 wrote:I've always tried to increase the OUT so I could eat what I wanted
The problem is optimism - imagining the huge number of calories being shed when exercising that actually are not shed and imagining that the little piece of brie is so small that it couldn't contain any calories at all.
Another way to fool oneself is to measure kilojoules on the expenditure side and calories for the intake.
PS - I am an optimist.
wayno wrote:try juicing vegetables for a more balanced fluid intake with minerals
Moondog55 wrote:Well the ski camping is really good for my weight control. Despite what seemed to me a lot of high calorie food being eaten I lost 5 kilos over the time I was away, 3 days travelling and 5 nites sleeping above 1500m and getting in at least 12 klicks on skis or mountain boots each day. A shame I fell and broke a back rib that is still healing but my blood pressure is already down a good bit and mentally I really needed to take time in the snow
CasualNerd wrote:I think the " calories in calories out" model is simplistic and flawed because we know for sure that the body reacts to different types of food. There are plenty of healthy omnivores and plenty of overweight vegetarians, it's not that simple.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests