hilleberg v Macpac

Bushwalking gear and paraphernalia. Electronic gadget topics (inc. GPS, PLB, chargers) belong in the 'Techno Babble' sub-forum.
Forum rules
TIP: The online Bushwalk Inventory System can help bushwalkers with a variety of bushwalk planning tasks, including: Manage which items they take bushwalking so that they do not forget anything they might need, plan meals for their walks, and automatically compile food/fuel shopping lists (lists of consumables) required to make and cook the meals for each walk. It is particularly useful for planning for groups who share food or other items, but is also useful for individual walkers.

hilleberg v Macpac

Postby shadow1243 » Mon 09 Feb, 2015 11:40 pm

I am new to this blog so please be patient.

We are going to Patagonia and need to upgrade our tent. Any comments on if we should pay the extra 100% for a Hilleberg Nallo 2 or settle for Macpac Minaret.
Very stong winds are predicted and some of the info on the Minaret indicate it just may not stand up to it.
Would appreciate any comments on this.
shadow1243
Nothofagus cunninghamii
Nothofagus cunninghamii
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon 09 Feb, 2015 11:04 pm
Region: Western Australia

Re: hilleberg v Macpac

Postby Strider » Wed 11 Feb, 2015 6:34 am

What other options have you considered?
User avatar
Strider
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 5875
Joined: Mon 07 Nov, 2011 6:55 pm
Location: Point Cook
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: hilleberg v Macpac

Postby stry » Wed 11 Feb, 2015 7:56 am

I started a thread not long ago about the new Minaret (sorry *&%$#! software won't let me link it) in which there is some feedback on stormworthiness.

I note that you have used the word "we". I think the Nallo 2 is a bit roomier than the Minaret - it certainly has a bigger footprint. A check of the respective websites will give you an idea of internal dimensions.
stry
Athrotaxis selaginoides
Athrotaxis selaginoides
 
Posts: 1430
Joined: Mon 10 Jun, 2013 6:28 pm
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: hilleberg v Macpac

Postby Moondog55 » Wed 11 Feb, 2015 8:07 am

Ve are too soon old und too late schmart
Moondog55
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 11176
Joined: Thu 03 Dec, 2009 4:15 pm
Location: Norlane Geelong Victoria Australia
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: hilleberg v Macpac

Postby Mickl » Wed 11 Feb, 2015 10:14 am

What about the Olympus? Not a lot heavier if shared between two and has the extra entrance/ extra pole/ more internal room? If you get one on a 'sale' that they often have it should be a lot less than a Hilleberg still.
User avatar
Mickl
Athrotaxis cupressoides
Athrotaxis cupressoides
 
Posts: 277
Joined: Mon 14 Apr, 2014 10:42 pm
Region: South Australia
Gender: Male

Re: hilleberg v Macpac

Postby stry » Wed 11 Feb, 2015 10:59 am

Mickl wrote:What about the Olympus? Not a lot heavier if shared between two and has the extra entrance/ extra pole/ more internal room? If you get one on a 'sale' that they often have it should be a lot less than a Hilleberg still.


Way more room than the Minaret and more room than many other two person tents, particularly vestibule and head room. $540 at the just finished four day sale.

Photos show snow valances on the vestibule, but not the main tent ???? WT....

In a different class perhaps, but the OP Goondie 3 could be a candidate also.
stry
Athrotaxis selaginoides
Athrotaxis selaginoides
 
Posts: 1430
Joined: Mon 10 Jun, 2013 6:28 pm
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: hilleberg v Macpac

Postby Moondog55 » Wed 11 Feb, 2015 12:32 pm

I have heard that Patagonia is called the Place of the Winds for a reason and for that reason I would go with a 3 pole tent or a geodome and as we often say here take one person from a tents stated occupancy, if you are reasonably big a Minaret is a solo tent
Ve are too soon old und too late schmart
Moondog55
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 11176
Joined: Thu 03 Dec, 2009 4:15 pm
Location: Norlane Geelong Victoria Australia
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: hilleberg v Macpac

Postby Empty » Wed 11 Feb, 2015 3:54 pm

Speaking purely form the point of quality and bullet proof fabrics ( rather than features) it is very hard to go past a Hilleberg, despite the premium price.

You will be handing it down to your grandkids.
I may be doing the typing but Steve Jobs is doing the spelling!
Empty
Athrotaxis cupressoides
Athrotaxis cupressoides
 
Posts: 214
Joined: Thu 06 Feb, 2014 3:04 pm
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: hilleberg v Macpac

Postby walkon » Wed 11 Feb, 2015 5:59 pm

Empty wrote:Speaking purely form the point of quality and bullet proof fabrics ( rather than features) it is very hard to go past a Hilleberg, despite the premium price.

You will be handing it down to your grandkids.


I wish I had of just bought a hilleberg years ago. It would have saved me cash in the long run by a mile and freed up months of Internet searches :lol: also would have had a better nights sleep on a heap of occasions not worrying whether the tent is going to come apart.
Cheers Walkon

"I live in a very small house, but my windows look out on a very large world."
User avatar
walkon
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
 
Posts: 785
Joined: Sun 24 Nov, 2013 7:03 am
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: hilleberg v Macpac

Postby DarrenM » Wed 11 Feb, 2015 6:51 pm

The minaret is tight for two in alpine. Cant speak for the Nallo but quality gear for sure.
DarrenM
Athrotaxis cupressoides
Athrotaxis cupressoides
 
Posts: 465
Joined: Tue 19 Oct, 2010 7:10 pm
Location: Sydney
Region: New South Wales
Gender: Male

Re: hilleberg v Macpac

Postby DarrenM » Wed 11 Feb, 2015 8:01 pm

Just to add....Any tent is only as good as its snow wall on snow with real wind, and as Moondog suggests, I'd be looking at something fairly substantial with more than two poles for a trip in Patagonia and the like.
DarrenM
Athrotaxis cupressoides
Athrotaxis cupressoides
 
Posts: 465
Joined: Tue 19 Oct, 2010 7:10 pm
Location: Sydney
Region: New South Wales
Gender: Male

Re: hilleberg v Macpac

Postby walkon » Wed 11 Feb, 2015 8:21 pm

DarrenM wrote:Just to add....Any tent is only as good as its snow wall on snow with real wind, and as Moondog suggests, I'd be looking at something fairly substantial with more than two poles for a trip in Patagonia and the like.


I'd disagree re snow wall, as I others have started and I've seen, wind and rain will disintegrate snow walls.

Plenty of YouTube videos of hillebergs in wind tests and in nature. Saw one the other day of a Nallo broadside taking 100kph wind and another even more end on.
Cheers Walkon

"I live in a very small house, but my windows look out on a very large world."
User avatar
walkon
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
 
Posts: 785
Joined: Sun 24 Nov, 2013 7:03 am
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: hilleberg v Macpac

Postby ninjapuppet » Wed 11 Feb, 2015 8:54 pm

Ive done a 10 day trek in the bolivian mountains with 5000m passes using an msr hubba hubba for 2.
Not sure how much harsher patagonia would be, but my bet is that you'll survive with either of them tents.

However, considering my tickets to bolivia was over $3k, i think the extra price paid for a hilleberg is insignificant compared to your travel costs.
Well worth the extra $$. Paying your huge costs to get there and scrimping on your shelter money seems like a silly idea.
User avatar
ninjapuppet
Athrotaxis selaginoides
Athrotaxis selaginoides
 
Posts: 1225
Joined: Mon 09 Nov, 2009 11:33 pm
Region: New Zealand
Gender: Male

Re: hilleberg v Macpac

Postby andrewbish » Wed 11 Feb, 2015 9:48 pm

There's wind...and then there's wind... A friend is currently climbing Aconcagua, in Argentina. At the final airport she met some guys who'd had to bail out after encountering tent shredding winds at -40C. The winds are strong and persistent in Patagonia, but I think it unlikely that you will meet tent-destroying conditions. A Minaret (which I own) would be fine, but it's small - a 1.5 person tent, so I wouldn't recommend it. (And the roomier MacPac Olympus is on the heavy side).

I don't own a Hilleberg, but would love to have one from their Red or Black series, for snow and/or gale conditions. The tent fabric is VERY strong - very hard to tear. The poles would probably go before the fabric did.

If you are still concerned about the conditions, a Hilleberg is the tent for you. Next you need to work out which model..and there's some beauties! My good buddy, Walkon is a big fan of the tunnels (Anjan2, Nammatj2, Kaitum2) . Me, I fancy the domes, with their bigger space and side entrances (Rogen, Allak).
Twitter: @andrewbishxplor Blog: Trails & tracks
User avatar
andrewbish
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
 
Posts: 781
Joined: Mon 03 Jan, 2011 7:08 pm
Location: Melbourne
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: hilleberg v Macpac

Postby DarrenM » Thu 12 Feb, 2015 4:24 am

walkon wrote:
DarrenM wrote:Just to add....Any tent is only as good as its snow wall on snow with real wind, and as Moondog suggests, I'd be looking at something fairly substantial with more than two poles for a trip in Patagonia and the like.


I'd disagree re snow wall, as I others have started and I've seen, wind and rain will disintegrate snow walls.

Plenty of YouTube videos of hillebergs in wind tests and in nature. Saw one the other day of a Nallo broadside taking 100kph wind and another even more end on.


How many blizzards have you sat out with and without a snow wall?

I can guarantee you that in proper wind.....tents of any make can be destroyed. I've seen it happen a few times including them get blown away with 30 kgs of gear in them.

If they are getting damaged, get up and start shovelling.
DarrenM
Athrotaxis cupressoides
Athrotaxis cupressoides
 
Posts: 465
Joined: Tue 19 Oct, 2010 7:10 pm
Location: Sydney
Region: New South Wales
Gender: Male

Re: hilleberg v Macpac

Postby Drew » Thu 12 Feb, 2015 8:53 am

It also depends what exactly you're doing in Patagonia. Doing Torres del Paine or Fitz Roy or similar is rather different to an expedition across the Patagonian Ice Field! I've hiked Fitz Roy (twice), Torres del Paine (twice), Villarica Traverse (in snow), Nahuel Huapi Traverse, in 3 different tents, varying from seriously el cheapo to half-decent but not very solid at all. Yes, it can be seriously windy in Patagonia, but on the more popular hikes there are often quite sheltered campsites.

I'm not suggesting you stay away from the Hilleberg. I'm sure it's a fantastic tent that you'll have for years and you'll have great piece of mind. But don't let Patagonia's reputation pressure you into a purchase you don't want/need to make.

As a side note: Yes, climbing Aconcagua is a different kettle of fish indeed - it's the highest mountain outside the Himalayas! And it's not in Patagonia...
Drew
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
 
Posts: 788
Joined: Fri 13 Jan, 2012 11:16 am
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: hilleberg v Macpac

Postby Strider » Thu 12 Feb, 2015 10:49 am

What about an Exped Venus II Extreme?

http://www.exped.com/australia/en/produ ... ii-extreme
User avatar
Strider
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 5875
Joined: Mon 07 Nov, 2011 6:55 pm
Location: Point Cook
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: hilleberg v Macpac

Postby walkon » Thu 12 Feb, 2015 1:31 pm

Bugger had a post go missing, get back to you darren

Venus is about $770 and 2.95kg
Nallo is about $900 and 2.4kg

Money is about the same with half a kilo difference

Msr hubba hubba about $770 & 2kg with ground sheet and collapses in 70kph winds ( wind tested)
Cheers Walkon

"I live in a very small house, but my windows look out on a very large world."
User avatar
walkon
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
 
Posts: 785
Joined: Sun 24 Nov, 2013 7:03 am
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: hilleberg v Macpac

Postby wayno » Thu 12 Feb, 2015 1:42 pm

its not necessarily a strong sustained wind that you should be worried about with a tent, a strong gusts are what really stress the tents and are more likely to wreck them..
like avalanches that destroy buildings, the snow often doesnt do the damage its the high pressure increase and wind blast in front of the avalanche that often does the damage....
from the land of the long white clouds...
User avatar
wayno
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 8685
Joined: Sun 19 Jun, 2011 7:26 am
Location: NZ
Region: New Zealand
Gender: Male

Re: hilleberg v Macpac

Postby walkon » Thu 12 Feb, 2015 1:55 pm

wayno wrote:its not necessarily a strong sustained wind you should be worried about with a tent, a strong gusts are what really stress the tents and are more likely to wreck them..
like avalanches that destroy buildings, the snow often doesnt do the damage its the high pressure increase and wind blast in front of the avalanche that often does the damage....


That's what my missing post basically said. Some Norwegian adventurers artic and norway don't dig a snow wall as you get wind turbulence from it. They use hilleberg and can't remember the other make, basically shovel a little bit of snow at the base of the tent and leave it. Both of these aren't crap tents though.
Cheers Walkon

"I live in a very small house, but my windows look out on a very large world."
User avatar
walkon
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
 
Posts: 785
Joined: Sun 24 Nov, 2013 7:03 am
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: hilleberg v Macpac

Postby Strider » Thu 12 Feb, 2015 3:17 pm

walkon wrote:They use hilleberg and can't remember the other make

Helsport?

http://www.helsport.no/?___store=english
User avatar
Strider
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 5875
Joined: Mon 07 Nov, 2011 6:55 pm
Location: Point Cook
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: hilleberg v Macpac

Postby DarrenM » Thu 12 Feb, 2015 3:28 pm

I think Drew is on the money in regards to what the OP is actually doing. I doubt very much that they'll end up on the ice cap otherwise they wouldn't have asked the question they have.

Walkon, In the context of this thread and in particular the two tents in question, I'll stand by what I've said before based on spending years in terrible snow conditions in all types of tents. In a lightweight two person tent with only two poles, you definitely need a snow wall when the wind comes on properly. You can read all the info you want out of a book on polar travel but there is a fairly massive difference once again about the actual topic and context.

Katabatic conditions require completely different tents and techniques.
DarrenM
Athrotaxis cupressoides
Athrotaxis cupressoides
 
Posts: 465
Joined: Tue 19 Oct, 2010 7:10 pm
Location: Sydney
Region: New South Wales
Gender: Male

Re: hilleberg v Macpac

Postby stry » Thu 12 Feb, 2015 4:59 pm

If you lie on your back all night, using your hands and feet to brace the poles, it definitely reduces the likelihood of collapse.

Not too fresh of spirit the next day though :D
stry
Athrotaxis selaginoides
Athrotaxis selaginoides
 
Posts: 1430
Joined: Mon 10 Jun, 2013 6:28 pm
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: hilleberg v Macpac

Postby wayno » Thu 12 Feb, 2015 5:10 pm

I couldnt say if theres a dominant school of thought on tent snow walls in NZ... I've seen them used sometimes and other times not but, you'd need to be pretty sure of your tent design not to use on in a storm in an exposed location...
from the land of the long white clouds...
User avatar
wayno
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 8685
Joined: Sun 19 Jun, 2011 7:26 am
Location: NZ
Region: New Zealand
Gender: Male

Re: hilleberg v Macpac

Postby walkon » Thu 12 Feb, 2015 7:28 pm

Darren, my missing post basically stated my actual experiences in this and what I have found out through different published sources, 140kph + winds in summer are the same velocity as 140kph+ winds in winter. Seen it lived it, spoke to others who have as well and then after listening to how/why they coped compared to me I acted on it. We all have different experiences, deal with them in different ways and take different things out of it. Yes i still use snow walls but i dont sweat it, depending on your tent the snow wall isn't the be all or end all.

Shadow, in your other post you stated you were a 55 year old experienced couple. If you are active walkers and you think that there is a fair chance that your health, touch wood, is likely to continue to allow lots more walking into the future then you will certainly get the value out of your hilleburg. That said the resale on the hille's is good if you look after it.
The two virtually weigh the same, Nallo has more interior room and is more versatile.
The hilleberg red labels tents have stood up to insane winds absolutely exposed with no protection at all for a long time now.
That said the minaret is a good tent and cheaper. I would recommend taking your sleeping mats into the shop and trying it for size with your other half, you spend a fair bit of time in the tent and want to be comfortable, if you fit then great if not the $400 difference (gumtree or Mountain adventure centre NSW) isn't much, a couple of nights at a decent hotel or a small fraction of this trip. Good luck and I hope your trip is great, I hopefully will be there next/later this year so tell us about it.
Last edited by walkon on Thu 12 Feb, 2015 7:53 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Cheers Walkon

"I live in a very small house, but my windows look out on a very large world."
User avatar
walkon
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
 
Posts: 785
Joined: Sun 24 Nov, 2013 7:03 am
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: hilleberg v Macpac

Postby Moondog55 » Thu 12 Feb, 2015 7:41 pm

Perhaps the question could be restated as "IF things got really bad what's the minimum tent i should take?" so perhaps given that the tent purchase is such a small [relatively] percentage of the trips overall cost which tent will give the greatest benefit in the next 10 years?
In this area would a Hilleberg Black Label tent be a better option>?
My only experience with Hilleberg was Sim1oz's at PV last winter and I was seriously impressed with the quality and workmanship even tho I personally prefer geodomes
Ve are too soon old und too late schmart
Moondog55
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 11176
Joined: Thu 03 Dec, 2009 4:15 pm
Location: Norlane Geelong Victoria Australia
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: hilleberg v Macpac

Postby DarrenM » Thu 12 Feb, 2015 8:10 pm

walkon wrote:Darren, my missing post basically stated my actual experiences

Restate them. I want to know what your actual experience is with building snow walls in storms because once again people give out info but when you dig a little deeper, they have very little experience. Hearsay around here is usually *&^%$#!.
DarrenM
Athrotaxis cupressoides
Athrotaxis cupressoides
 
Posts: 465
Joined: Tue 19 Oct, 2010 7:10 pm
Location: Sydney
Region: New South Wales
Gender: Male

Re: hilleberg v Macpac

Postby walkon » Thu 12 Feb, 2015 9:26 pm

Darren pm sent, trying to keep thread on topic
Cheers Walkon

"I live in a very small house, but my windows look out on a very large world."
User avatar
walkon
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
 
Posts: 785
Joined: Sun 24 Nov, 2013 7:03 am
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: hilleberg v Macpac

Postby ninjapuppet » Thu 12 Feb, 2015 10:02 pm

Dont care what people say about snow walls, but when winds pick up, I use them!
At base camp on Denali, everyone was using them!
denali.jpg


Doesnt matter how strong your tent is, Winds strong enough WILL flatten it. I had a hilleberg Dome tent flatten on me in strong winds (theres my report on here somewhere) and theres not many tents around stronger than a hilleberg Jannu for 3 kg.
OP has to basically weigh up costs, weight and expected conditions. The cost of a hilleberg is usually not justified for most people, but when compared to the cost of big trip to Patagonia, I think its very justified.
User avatar
ninjapuppet
Athrotaxis selaginoides
Athrotaxis selaginoides
 
Posts: 1225
Joined: Mon 09 Nov, 2009 11:33 pm
Region: New Zealand
Gender: Male

Re: hilleberg v Macpac

Postby Scottyk » Thu 12 Feb, 2015 10:53 pm

DarrenM wrote:
walkon wrote:Darren, my missing post basically stated my actual experiences

Restate them. I want to know what your actual experience is with building snow walls in storms because once again people give out info but when you dig a little deeper, they have very little experience. Hearsay around here is usually *&^%$#!.

Aren't we lucky to have you to be the inforcer of you has experience and who doesn't.
:roll:
User avatar
Scottyk
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
 
Posts: 789
Joined: Tue 16 Apr, 2013 9:00 am
ASSOCIATED ORGANISATIONS: www.tasgear.com.au
Region: Tasmania
Gender: Male

Next

Return to Equipment

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 39 guests