Since my earlier post, I did some digging around the various GPS forums for users experiences.
I have also spotted some images of the new device's internals originally posted on a geocaching forum
http://forums.groundspeak.com/GC/index. ... 996&st=100I have circled the patch antenna used in the 600 series, and the new combined WiFi / GPS antenna in the new 700 series.
As I suspected, this new antenna is similar to those used in some smartphones/tablets and is mounted at the front edge of the PCB facing upwards - this is to generate an almost hemispherical radiation pattern facing the sky to achieve optimal GPS signal strength and acquisition. This means that the new 700 series should get a good signal with the unit held vertically.
Patch antennas (like those used in the Oregon 600 and eTrex units) are directional, and have stronger signal reception when the antenna is held horizontally (ie. facing the sky). Additionally the position of the patch antenna on the back of the PCB on the Oregon 600 series means that in challenging signal conditions, you might get better reception if the GPS is held horizontally with the screen facing the ground, and the back battery compartment facing the sky.
Anecdotally from user reports, it appears that the new antenna is actually an improvement, and results in quicker satellite signal acquisitions. However, I have not yet spotted a qualified comparison between an Oregon 600 and the new 700 units in a cold start signal acquisition or comparing signal strengths.
There has been at least one early adopters complaining stated that their 700 screen is not as bright as the 600 series screen, making their use in sunny conditions more challenging. Not many people have mentioned this so I might have to pop into JA GPS and have a look for myself.
So, aside from the usual new Garmin device firmware issues and software bugs that inevitably crop up, I may yet change my opinion on the new 700/750 unit.