Mark F wrote:How accurate this is? You need to be careful not to confuse the relative accuracy (difference between one reading and the next) and the accuracy against the temperature scale. Most electronic temperature devices are accurate to about 0.1 degree over their range but you need to standardise the unit against a known temperature source to know the offset - this is the +-2 degrees mentioned above (real temperature 10 deg, unit reads 11). Having used 20 mercury thermometers for a scientific study and had to calibrate them, they were all over the place - way over the 2 degrees difference. I am not fussed about the offset difference as a degree isn't important except for bragging (-7 at Whites River last Sunday morning).
Hi Mark, are you trying to explain the difference between accuracy and precision here and calling 'relative accuracy' what should be called precision unknowingly or am I just confused? (it's not hard sometimes

) Accuracy is how close a measured value is to the
actual or true value & precision is how close each of the measured values
are to each other. The offset that you mention with some thermometers is probably the same thing as
bias, for example some devices will always read +1 of a degree above the actual value, so 11 if it's 10° or 25 if it's really 24 and so on. Meaning that instrument has a high precision but an accuracy bias of +1 degree. I don't know what scientific study you were doing but 2 degrees sounds like a lot of difference, it might have been easier to just dunk your toes in
I don't know why the garmin website is so lacking in information regarding accuracy or pretty much anything else about the tempe, maybe to cover their *&^%$#@!, but a few good reviews are popping up and from what I've seen I'm keen to get one before I go on my next winter trip out west, I know it doesn't really make a difference to a trip knowing how cold it really gets but bragging rights alone make it worth the $30!