Sat 20 Jul, 2013 7:51 pm
Sun 21 Jul, 2013 10:46 am
Sun 21 Jul, 2013 10:50 am
Sun 21 Jul, 2013 8:23 pm
Sun 21 Jul, 2013 9:47 pm
Sun 21 Jul, 2013 11:33 pm
Mon 22 Jul, 2013 7:21 am
Mon 22 Jul, 2013 8:31 am
frenchy_84 wrote:Its a top effort but what is meant by a quickstep record? Because its certainly not the quickest time to complete the OT.
Tue 23 Jul, 2013 8:39 am
Tue 23 Jul, 2013 8:46 am
Tue 23 Jul, 2013 8:29 pm
Tue 23 Jul, 2013 9:07 pm
AndyR wrote:The two dads walked an hour behind as a safety backup and had hourly radio contact.
Wed 24 Jul, 2013 10:36 am
MrWalker wrote:AndyR wrote:The two dads walked an hour behind as a safety backup and had hourly radio contact.
Hey, that means the dads must have walked the distance in 24hrs as well. Its OK for these youngsters, but for older blokes that must have taken an effort keeping going all night. How come they didn't get their photo in the paper too?
I assume the mums had to get up in the cold at some ridiculous hour to head down the track and meet them well before their 7am finish.
Well done all of you.
Thu 25 Jul, 2013 11:25 am
Thu 25 Jul, 2013 12:25 pm
Thu 01 Aug, 2013 1:56 pm
Sun 04 Aug, 2013 4:21 pm
kanangra wrote:Good on you guys. What a great family achievement all round. Tremendous. I suspect both girls must keep pretty active? Did they do anything in particular to prepare? Did you all catch the boat out together?
K
Sun 04 Aug, 2013 4:35 pm
Sun 04 Aug, 2013 7:36 pm
In all seriousness, I was quite surprised at the quoted 11kg pack weight. Would be interesting to see a gear list.wayno wrote:great achievement
hmm, looks like heavy macpac packs, could have gone much faster if they used lighter gear....
Sun 04 Aug, 2013 7:44 pm
Strider wrote:In all seriousness, I was quite surprised at the quoted 11kg pack weight. Would be interesting to see a gear list.wayno wrote:great achievement
hmm, looks like heavy macpac packs, could have gone much faster if they used lighter gear....
Sun 04 Aug, 2013 8:35 pm
wayno wrote:Strider wrote:In all seriousness, I was quite surprised at the quoted 11kg pack weight. Would be interesting to see a gear list.wayno wrote:great achievement
hmm, looks like heavy macpac packs, could have gone much faster if they used lighter gear....
they should talk to phil
Sun 04 Aug, 2013 9:33 pm
MrWalker wrote:AndyR (dad) said they had a tent, for emergency use, and an EPIRB and 2-way radio, plus some cooking gear, so they had more than would be required for a day-walk. No doubt they could have had a lighter pack but it could not have been cut much more without reducing their safety margin a bit.
Sun 04 Aug, 2013 10:39 pm
GPSGuided wrote:MrWalker wrote:AndyR (dad) said they had a tent, for emergency use, and an EPIRB and 2-way radio, plus some cooking gear, so they had more than would be required for a day-walk. No doubt they could have had a lighter pack but it could not have been cut much more without reducing their safety margin a bit.
For school students, going ultra-light may well be beyond their financial capability. As they are, they were being responsible in terms of safety. Further, the regular pack weight contributed to the validity of their time. I think it's a joke when record breakers are supported by a porter crew of 10, carrying gears that they should have carried.
Mon 05 Aug, 2013 6:56 am
Strider wrote:For the record, I am not criticising the weight carried. More so I am interested as it seems fairly heavy what was planned to be be a relatively short trip (temporally). I suspect they had several days food with them also that was included in this weight?
Mon 05 Aug, 2013 10:57 am
Mon 05 Aug, 2013 11:05 am
Mon 05 Aug, 2013 11:11 am
Mon 05 Aug, 2013 2:22 pm
wayno wrote:one trick with cold water is have a bottle inside your jacket, some jackets have pockets inside for you to put them in,
Mon 05 Aug, 2013 2:36 pm
© Bushwalk Australia and contributors 2007-2013.