Nuts wrote:Once up and walking, the guides form the basis of (the companies influence over the) experience. Guides come and go from all of companies and they will be a large part of 'what matters' outside the inclusions expected from the walk description. At best any positive experience should probably be in context, if the guides are different, the experience will largely be unrelated. That said, (imo) a guide should play a supportive role wherever possible so the biggest factor for success may in fact be that which comes from the 'clients' rather than the guides. There is an element of luck involved. Does that make sense?
I can actually answer this question as someone who has been on a guided walk down the OT, and I would echo Nuts thoughts here entirely. Two things make a good guided trip: the guides and the guests (clients?) Factors like weather can have an effect, but in reality it is the response of the group to these factors that define their impact.
I don't think it's necessary to mention the company here because this was a long time ago and it was my first walking experience in Tas. I happen to know that the guides we had are no longer working in Tasmania, but they were excellent. They knew the country and were able to give good local context to the unfolding landscape in both the historical and natural.
Guests on my trip were generally good friendly folk, I still have occasional contact with a couple of them. We did have one twirp hiking in brand new boots - turned out to be the poster child for why you should not do this.
I recommend a guided walk to anyone who lacks the experience to safely conduct their own trip. It may seem a high premium, but when you see the work the guides do to take much of the load off in terms of weight and looking after the daily food and camp prep, I think its more than a fair exchange.