MrWalker wrote:Well, I was totally wrong yesterday when i said he couldn't possibly do it in 4 days because he couldn't average the required 21 km/day.
He's done 22km and still going after 10 hrs. It looks like he doesn't plan to stop until he gets to Louisa River camp.
jmac wrote:There has been a generous offer from one member of this forum to meet, feed, collect him if he finishes between Sun PM and Tues. Not sure if the offerer is happy to be outed, or keep the offer on the quiet.
ILUVSWTAS wrote:The end is in sight, that gives a bit of a boost to the energy levels. He's on a good track now too which will throw the average from the rest of his trip straight out the window. My prediction of out on the 23rd is still on... though I suspect he will camp at Sth cape bay the last night to give the supporters a chance to drive down the next morning to meet him as he walks out at lunchtime on the 24th.
ILUVSWTAS wrote:MrWalker wrote:Well, I was totally wrong
The end is in sight,
beardless wrote:Does anyone know the reason for the 21 September deadline. Is that 50 days? When his food will run out? Or something else?
I think he will make the Southern Ocean.
If he can get past the impoundment in the next couple of days and can add a couple more days I would back him to complete the south coast track.
Mowser wrote:I reckon he might have a crack at getting to Surprise Bay or Granite today. Would be a MASSIVE day but he'd then almost certainly get out Saturday night. I know at the end of a 26 epic we found it extremely hard to stay put at SCR for the night. Looks like he's set himself some waypoint goals for the day?
Warin wrote:ILUVSWTAS wrote:MrWalker wrote:Well, I was totally wrong
The end is in sight,
Fresh food is in sight .. he can smell it. Along with a hot shower. And a bed that is clean and warm.
Motivation is a marvellous thing.
Mowser wrote:I reckon he might have a crack at getting to Surprise Bay or Granite today. Would be a MASSIVE day but he'd then almost certainly get out Saturday night. I know at the end of a 26 epic we found it extremely hard to stay put at SCR for the night. Looks like he's set himself some waypoint goals for the day?
north-north-west wrote:Did s/he manage to convince Margot Robbie to go along?
mikeb wrote:Watching him plod slowly up and down the Ironbounds makes me wonder why a low level coastal route has never been constructed - anyone know why not? It doesn't look too bad in the aerial images - most of the western and southern facing slopes are open and easy, then a track could possibly follow the contour around the larger valley in the middle then be routed over the 840ft saddle behind the minor headland.
north-north-west wrote:
A big part of the philosophy behind Tasmanian tracks was always minimal disturbance. Going over the Ironbounds requires less cutting than a low-level route would, and the vegetation down there is a lot thicker than you would think from aerial imagery. Plus it gets you closer to the range summit and peakbagging has been a thing for a long time.
Then you would also have the issue of crossing the Louisa River near its mouth, or keep the crossing where it is and add a hell of a lot of squelching across the Louisa Plains (which means more damage as those sorts of plains turn to bog if you give them a hard stare).
By and large, the track takes what is overall the easiest and least damaging line. And the variety of a couple of decent climbs adds to the challenge.
north-north-west wrote:...turn to bog if you give them a hard stare...
north-north-west wrote:mikeb wrote:Watching him plod slowly up and down the Ironbounds makes me wonder why a low level coastal route has never been constructed - anyone know why not? It doesn't look too bad in the aerial images - most of the western and southern facing slopes are open and easy, then a track could possibly follow the contour around the larger valley in the middle then be routed over the 840ft saddle behind the minor headland.
A big part of the philosophy behind Tasmanian tracks was always minimal disturbance. Going over the Ironbounds requires less cutting than a low-level route would, and the vegetation down there is a lot thicker than you would think from aerial imagery. Plus it gets you closer to the range summit and peakbagging has been a thing for a long time.
Then you would also have the issue of crossing the Louisa River near its mouth, or keep the crossing where it is and add a hell of a lot of squelching across the Louisa Plains (which means more damage as those sorts of plains turn to bog if you give them a hard stare).
By and large, the track takes what is overall the easiest and least damaging line. And the variety of a couple of decent climbs adds to the challenge.
mikeb wrote:Watching him plod slowly up and down the Ironbounds makes me wonder why a low level coastal route has never been constructed - anyone know why not? It doesn't look too bad in the aerial images - most of the western and southern facing slopes are open and easy, then a track could possibly follow the contour around the larger valley in the middle then be routed over the 840ft saddle behind the minor headland.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests