mikeb wrote:I'm not convinced that the track does follow the easiest and least damaging line - tracks up and down slopes=erosion. Its taken a huge amount of trackwork over decades to manage erosion on this section and this work is ongoing.
The Louisa Plains could easily be avoided by benching around the lower slopes of the Ironbounds, similar to the section of the PDT around the end on the W Arthurs or the section of the SCT around the NE end of the New Harbour Range. And the section through the rainforest would be shorter than the current descent through the rainforest.
More likely a (literal) case of path dependence - that once you have done something one way, you get locked in, and it becomes hard to change and do something different, even if that might be/have been a better option. In this case the early track cutters routed their escape route for shipwrecked sailors up an open lead and over, when erosion and large numbers of walkers weren't considerations, and we have become locked in through our past investments and the significant cost to reroute.
jmac wrote:Although this sounds gross to me; it’s what he’s asking for at present: “Sugar:chocolate,cookies,coke,banana. 600g to fill belly.”
Personally I can’t see what’s wrong with a few Moo Brew Single Hops and a dozen smoked salmon blinis with creme fraiche, a hint of horseradish and a sprig of fresh dill, followed by a really good home made spaghetti bolognese.
tastrax wrote:Ha ha, I will keep that in mind if I get down to meet him. I might even be able to get the key to Rangers quarters and he can have a shower!
GPSGuided wrote:What’s a track if there’s not an epic climb? Might as circle round and round on a beach or on the plain.
jmac wrote:
Personally I can’t see what’s wrong with a few Moo Brew Single Hops and a dozen smoked salmon blinis with creme fraiche, a hint of horseradish and a sprig of fresh dill, followed by a really good home made spaghetti bolognese.
jmac wrote:Although this sounds gross to me; it’s what he’s asking for at present: “Sugar:chocolate,cookies,coke,banana. 600g to fill belly.
ILUVSWTAS wrote:GPSGuided wrote:What’s a track if there’s not an epic climb? Might as circle round and round on a beach or on the plain.
Yep, I agree. It adds a good bit of variety to this classic walk. Following the path of the shipwrecked sailors is a big part of it too I think.
north-north-west wrote:Checked in a Little Deadmans at 19:40. Rest and a meal or stopping for the night?
stepbystep wrote:Super solid effort. He's travelling like he's depleted, very understandably...he'd benefit from some bush tucker skills now, there's plenty of food on that coast!
jmac wrote:Although this sounds gross to me; it’s what he’s asking for at present: “Sugar:chocolate,cookies,coke,banana. 600g to fill belly.”
Personally I can’t see what’s wrong with a few Moo Brew Single Hops and a dozen smoked salmon blinis with creme fraiche, a hint of horseradish and a sprig of fresh dill, followed by a really good home made spaghetti bolognese.
Orion wrote:
Technically the equinox is at a specific time. This year it occurs at 11:54am on Sunday. It could be close.
geoskid wrote:Orion wrote:
Technically the equinox is at a specific time. This year it occurs at 11:54am on Sunday. It could be close.
My understanding is that he has achieved what he set out to do, and is now simply exiting.
Overlandman wrote:Links
https://eur-share.inreach.garmin.com/louphi
http://www.louis-philippe-loncke.com
Go Lou-Phi
mikeb wrote:I see he has walked The SCT before ( https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iMC8WW0yek0 ). And has walked the section east of Prion Lagoon twice. Must be nice for him to be back in familiar territory and might make the decision to walk at night easier.
jmac wrote:...how few camp spots exist between Granite Beach and the Rivulet.
north-north-west wrote:If you're going to be pedantic, the first time he changed his original projected route that announcement became null.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests