Mt Exmouth & Bluff Mtn (Warrumbungle NP) - which is higher?

NSW & ACT specific bushwalking discussion.
Forum rules
NSW & ACT specific bushwalking discussion. Please avoid publishing details of access to sensitive areas with no tracks.

Mt Exmouth & Bluff Mtn (Warrumbungle NP) - which is higher?

Postby paul8 » Wed 21 Oct, 2015 10:01 pm

In Warrumbungle National Park, which mountain is higher - Mt Exmouth or Bluff Mountain?

Officially, Mt Exmouth is the highest in Warrumbungle NP:
Mt Exmouth - 1206 m
Bluff Mountain - 1200 m

My Garmin GPS says Bluff Mountain is higher:
Mt Exmouth - 1187 m
Bluff Mountain - 1197 m

My friend's Garmin GPS (different model) also says Bluff Mountain is higher:
Mt Exmouth - 1181 m
Bluff Mountain - 1189 m

In Google Earth, Bluff Mountain is higher too. If I hover the mouse over the mountains:
Mt Exmouth - 1166 m
Bluff Mountain - 1184 m
paul8
Athrotaxis cupressoides
Athrotaxis cupressoides
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Mon 13 Sep, 2010 5:58 pm
Location: Sydney
Region: New South Wales
Gender: Male

Re: Mt Exmouth & Bluff Mtn (Warrumbungle NP) - which is high

Postby kjbeath » Mon 26 Oct, 2015 7:27 pm

I would have a lot more faith in the official figures, although they do get it wrong sometimes. Twentieth century surveying techniques should be able to get the height differences correct for two hills that close together.

GPS height figures are only accurate to about 5-15m but can be worse depending on the GPS. Also they will change with the configuration of the satellites. Sitting there for a longer time will give a better results. You should try it with a very well surveyed mountain like Kosciusko.
kjbeath
Athrotaxis cupressoides
Athrotaxis cupressoides
 
Posts: 174
Joined: Tue 28 Sep, 2010 6:02 pm
Region: New South Wales
Gender: Male


Return to New South Wales & ACT

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 59 guests