by Hallu » Thu 05 Sep, 2013 2:13 pm
Wow that's a daunting work you did, thanks for the translation and summary. I notice that they're very careful with their words. It's never a big task, they won't eradicate anything, they will "contain" or "reduce the abundance". Unfortunately, unless you eradicate a feral species, it will keep coming back again to alarming numbers, so I don't see the point. Unless they have a new virus for those species, as they did with the rabbits...
Overall it's a lot of minor cosmetics changes, no big reform. What would people like in that area ? First that their stupid pine plantation would stop. This is Australia, land of the eucalypt, why the hell would we need pine plantations ? These plantations did more damage on the wildlife and landscape than all the feral species combined. Everybody knows that koalas eat eucalypt leaves and that many mammals and birds nest in eucalypts burrows. People would also like to see new areas being protected, this plan provides none. A big plan to save threatened species would be good too. Even in their details they stay very vague : "managing visitors' activities to minimize disturbance of seal colonies", what the hell does that mean ? Are they gonna make us pay to see the seals from land ? Remove walking tracks and observation platforms ? Limit the number of boats touring to see seals ? It's probably the latter, but again, they're so vague it's impossible to know what they're gonna do...