by Lophophaps » Mon 11 Aug, 2014 9:20 am
It's not just a question of bushwalkers voting about one issue. Most people will vote according to matters that more directly impact them. To this end, I strongly suggest that conservation is irrelevant for most people, simply does not register. So, while I have strong conservation views, I always reason from an economics aspect. East West link losing money, invest a dollar and get back 80 cents. Stop logging and better water quality, quantity and timing, lower costs. Alpine grazing and fossicking have similar impacts.
The message needs to be made known in emails, letters to MPS, and the papers. Give examples how the proposal will adversely impact the region. Get the locals on side: they will lose as well, especially accommodation places. I have lyrics running in my head:
They paved paradise and put up a parking lot,
With a pink hotel, a boutique,
And a swinging hot spot.
Don't it always seem to go,
That you don't know what you've got till it's gone,
They paved paradise and put up a parking lot.
Despite the abysmal financial management in Canberra, Liberals see themselves as the party of business. Show that their economic credentials are dismal and it will hurt them.