Xplora wrote:The water is closer at Kelly's. Just follow the 107 around the first bend and you come to a small creek. I have never found water close to Fitz's hut but then a again I have never had the need to go searching for it while there. The aqueduct is down the gully a bit. Perhaps Snowzone could elaborate and I will have a look next time I am there. It would be good to have water there as Kelly's hut is pretty manky.
paidal_chalne_vala wrote:The plan is to camp near the hut. I don't use the huts that much in green season whereas in White season they are life savers!..We are heading up to snow camp near Edmondson's hut this weekend in snow shoes but I doubt we will have time to visit Kelly's hut on the way back down Watchbed creek .
paidal_chalne_vala wrote:I know exactly where Johnston's hut is. Ditto for Ed. hut. I have been to both of them. Johnston's hut requires an advance booking with a particular ski club whereas Ed. hut does not.
Scout1920 wrote:I just visited both on Dec 21st. Both have water nearby.
Fitzgerald: as you walk towards the hut from the ridge, there is a very large tree to the right of the hut. Under the overhanging branch is a faint path that will lead you to water in 2 minutes.
Kelly: I found a sufficient water supply right at the beginning of Track 107, though imagine this will dry up over summer. The creek is 4 minutes further down the track.
In terms of which hut is better:
- Fitzgerald is the nicer hut, but Kelly is perfectly adequate
- Kelly is more sheltered and, IMO, prettier
- The toilet at Fitzgerald is newer but is plastic and was manky and covered in insects. Kelly's is timber and was much cleaner and more inviting.
north-north-west wrote:The one time I checked on Kelly's, part of a window or wall was leaking so badly there was at least six inches of snow on the floor below it. Fitzgerald's is a palace in comparison.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests