CaptainC wrote:Heaps of good camping spots around Cope Hut. I find it weird that people would pay to stay on a platform when there's great spots nearby.
Walk_fat boy_walk wrote:With the advent of platforms at Cope and Dibbins, is it still possible to camp on the ground in those locales without a booking? If not, are there any alternatives apart from Derrick and Cope Saddle/Ryders Yards (noting camping at Wallaces is a no no)? I'm planning a walk that overlaps with the alpine crossing but don't like to lock in an itinerary so don't want to pre-book campsites. I'm happy to camp anywhere with a little bit of shelter and accessible water - such localities might be in abundance (as they are in KNP, for example) but i'm not familiar with the BHP area.
Thanks in advance
Xplora wrote:There is a perception among less experienced walkers and even those who are not familiar with the area that camping is only permitted on the platforms and requires a booking. The information guide on PV website points to the platforms. Some people also feel it is better being off the ground. I see them as ugly and intrusive to the landscape but PV says they are protecting the ground from being damaged by people pitching tents. You only have to look at the area around Cleve Cole hut to see dispersed tents have done no damage to the ground and it would be one of the most popular places.
paidal_chalne_vala wrote:The camping platforms at Dibbin hut and Cope hut are ugly and to be avoided. Not enough people under the present route of the FHAC actually do the FHAC to make it a viable cash cow/ glamping / glossy brochure trek to rival the Overland track in Tasmania. The Diamantina spur is a nut cracker and very demanding and not for glampers and total newbies.
cammokazee wrote:Start of rant. ...Rant over. btw I'm sure this post will draw the wrath of countless armchair experts that exist on this forum. Can't wait for that.
cammokazee wrote:Start of rant.
Those camping platforms are a disgrace & should be removed. They are only there for the blingers, the same people who don't put water on a campfire. That upper Cobungra River area is beautiful. A toilet there at Dibbins is bad enough, but it's better than people leaving *&%$#! paper everywhere. Anyway talking about *&%$#! paper, my 15yo son & l (at his request) just did the top 10 peaks in KNP just under 45km in a little over 12 hrs from Charlotte Pass, never seen so much of it scattered around these magnificent high peaks. What the hell is wrong with some people? Btw the steel walkway from Mt.Carruthers to Mt.Northcote... why not build it over the existing track? Seems dumb to me. I'm sure there is some reason, always is!
cammokazee wrote:Oh and deer is out of control, rabbits appear to be having a bumper year too. Not even going to mention other ferals. And have l mentioned Indians, never seen so many of them around the mountains too.
peregrinator wrote:Pretty hard to disagree with what you wrote. Other than your comment on parks management. With the funding cuts they have been enduring over many years, it's no wonder they are struggling. I won't belabour the point here—just search on "parks vic (or parks nsw) declining funding" and the figures are all available . . .
cammokazee wrote:You get jumped on for not respecting other people & their cultures, but seriously how about respecting ours!
peregrinator wrote:Reading the responses by Walk_fat boy_walk, Xplora and Zapruda, I need to change my statement above about points of disagreement with cammokazee. Having no knowledge at all of the ten peaks concept, I skipped over that section of the post. I should have queried the bizarre reference to "Indians". That came out of nowhere and I totally failed to consider the intended meaning. If it is what I imagine it is, then "disgusting" is an apt response.
Zapruda wrote:This is such an unnecessary and xenophobic comment, especially after a sentence talking about feral animals. Disgusting
stry wrote:
I can't find any details in that link of the details of what is actually being tendered for.
Any idea where that info may be, or how it can be obtained ?
The Falls to Hotham Alpine Crossing Master Plan outlines the proposed 57 kilometre, multi day route which will take in the Diamantina Spur and Razorback with an optional ascent of Mount Feathertop, Victoria’s second highest peak. The Alpine Crossing links the Falls Creek and Mt Hotham Alpine Resorts.
Baeng72 wrote:stry wrote:
I can't find any details in that link of the details of what is actually being tendered for.
Any idea where that info may be, or how it can be obtained ?
The bit I was referring to:The Falls to Hotham Alpine Crossing Master Plan outlines the proposed 57 kilometre, multi day route which will take in the Diamantina Spur and Razorback with an optional ascent of Mount Feathertop, Victoria’s second highest peak. The Alpine Crossing links the Falls Creek and Mt Hotham Alpine Resorts.
https://www.parks.vic.gov.au/projects/f ... t-planning
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests