Lophophaps wrote:but they may be suss, feral horses
commando wrote:Lophophaps wrote:but they may be suss, feral horses
I do not like the term feral to describe any animal.
The feral descriptor should be entirely reserved for homo sapiens, who decided to put unwitting animals in those places in the first place,
and now try to blindly pass the buck in the name of wholesome self righteousness...
north-north-west wrote:
Your feelings don't come into it. "Feral" is the technically correct term. And, as humans created the problem, they also have the responsibility to fix or at least minimalise it.
The native ecosystems and species damaged and threatened by introduced species of plants and animals matter more than the ferals. Eliminate every feral from this land and those species will still exist elsewhere. Too many species that used to exist only here have gone in the last 250 years. How many more extinctions are you willing to accept?
Lophophaps wrote:There's water everywhere, with the longest distance between creeks about three hours. These are the water sources I can recall
Lophophaps wrote:A far simpler solution is to do a look based on near Falls Creek, Pretty Valley or Cope Hut.
Lophophaps wrote:Going that far at Easter, think about four days
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests