GBW wrote:I may need a sphygmomanometer with all these numbers.
slparker wrote:Addit:
http://www.paradisefirstaid.com.au/snak ... first-aid/
shows a setopress bandage being applied without relying on the coloured squares.
Lindsay wrote:slparker wrote:Addit:
http://www.paradisefirstaid.com.au/snak ... first-aid/
shows a setopress bandage being applied without relying on the coloured squares.
They say this: "The setopress bandage has a continuous series of brown indicators printed on the bandage. As the bandage is stretched the brown indicators become squares, this indicates the correct tension. For ease of application the brown squares are printed off centre which assists with providing a controlled wrap of half the width overlap on each turn. The bandage is textured which prevents the bandage from slipping."
Which is correct?
icefest wrote:Thanks for the information about the setopress slparker.
MickyB wrote:How would you treat a snake bite if bitten on a finger or toe? I imagine it would be very hard to bandage a digit? Sorry if this has been answered before.
slparker wrote:icefest wrote:Thanks for the information about the setopress slparker.
The research on this is interesting - it's clear that most first aiders do not meet the recommended pressure requirements for cessation of lymphatic drainage from the limb - yet people are still (relatively) effectively treated by the PIM method. Which tells me that:
1. Immobilisation is possibly just as important (as the studies quoted show limb movement will negate any compressive effects of the bandage)
2. even incorrect application of the bandage slows down envenomation (or at least delays envenomation during evacuation), and/or
3. Evacuation times and in-hospital treatments are very effective
The setopress is a neat idea - it just needs a third square for lymphatic compression. the only clinical application that I can think of is for lymphoedema and snakebite. I reckon there is scope for someone to do a study on using the existing setopress with a graduation adjacent to the brown square that would indicate effective tension at 55mmHg. this could be a pen mark at a determined distance adjacent to the brown square.
Of course this would need to be pre-marked on the bandage prior to use. best done on the loungeroom floor - not in the field, i imagine.
I assume it would not be difficult to come up with a reasonable approximation for such a graduation.http://bushwalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=295&start=150
Something that's puzzled me for a very long time is that all available texts dealing with the first aid treatment of snake bite show that the affected limb should be bandaged from the site of the bite (usually the lower extremity) towards the body (many texts specify: towards the heart). Since venom is initially transported through the lymphatic system is there not a chance of "forcing" the venom up through the lymph vessels when bandaging in this manner? This would likely only happen if some time has elapsed between being bitten and applying the bandage (say if one had to first tear clothes into strips in the absence of a bandage) and some of the venom is already in some of the major lymph vessels. I assume that the reason for applying the bandage directly to the site of the bite is to restrict the lymphatic system immediately surrounding the site and slow the venom uptake. However, what would happen if some time has elapsed between being bitten and applying the bandage? Is there some research/scientific publication that has dealt with this? If so I'd be grateful for a link or a reference to read up more on this particular aspect. All papers I've found so far deal with the efficacy of the crepe bandage technique and not the experimental manipulation of it.
R.
Hi all,
First of all, the use of pressure immobilisation bandaging (PIB) for snake bite first aid is not universally endorsed, and has a number of opponents. PIB was first recommended in Australia following a series of experiments using monkeys, and one of the common criticisms is that human trials of PIB efficacy do not exist. That may change some day. PIB is endorsed by the Australian Resuscitation Council for human use as first aid for the bites of Australasian elapid snakes, which do not have significantly cytotoxic venoms. There is no published evidence to support the use of PIB after bites by Viperidae, and opinions are divided on the appropriateness of PIB for bites by cytotoxic Elapidae, such as Naja nigricollis for example. Even the use of PIB in non-cytotoxic snakebite lacks a high-confidence evidence base, and there are some studies that have shown that the use of lymphatic transport actually depends to some degree on the size of the substances (i.e.: snake venom toxins) to be shifted, with some moving via the lymphatics and some moving straight into the microvasculature.
There has been robust debate in the past about the suitability of PIB in Africa. Anyone interested should explore the South African Medical Journal backissues from the '80's and perhaps early '90's. Certainly PIB should be viewed as a potentially life-saving form of first aid following bites by Dendroaspis spp., in particular.
Based on what we know at the moment, perhaps the single most important principle of first aid for any snake bite, however, should be the complete immobilisation of the snake bitten person.
Simply lay the person down right away, and remove any rings, watches, bracelets or other objects that might be a problem if local swelling occurs. A splint can be used to keep legs and arms straight and still - splint both the bitten leg and the unbitten one together, since this will help to restrict movement of the pelvis and keep the person still on a stretcher. Arms should be splinted straight, rather than bent and put in a sling, and if necessary they can be gently strapped to the side of the body.
Only if a bite from a snake with non-cytotoxic venom is suspected, should PIB be applied. The reason why bandages should be applied distal -> proximal is one of simply fluid dynamics. If you bandage a limb very firmly from the top down to the fingers or toes, you will flatten lymph vessels and small capillaries/veins, forcing blood and fluid into the hand or foot. Remember that based on what little is known of pressures needed to restrict lympathic transport, you need between 40-70 mmHg pressure for an arm, and 55-70 mmHg pressure for a leg - this is a lot firmer than most people realise. If you apply that sort of pressure in a proximal->distal direction, the result will quickly become extremely uncomfortable for the patient (downright painful in many cases), causing them to wringle, shift around or try and flex the limb to get some relief ... this completely defeats the purpose of PIB = pressure + immobilisation.
On the other hand, experience has shown that bandaging from just above the toes or fingertips to the top of the limb at the required pressure results in far less discomfort for the patient, and as a result greater compliance with immobilisation.
Does it result in venom being squeezed upwards? Impossible to say. If a broad bandage is used, once wrapped firmly over the bite site itself, most of the lymphatic vessels and small capillaries should be effectively compressed and much of the venom sequestered locally ... but without doing the experiments necessary to prove it, I am afraid there are no guarantees. I have used PIB after 5 of my 6 snake bites, and I am still here to tell the tales ... but that, in the words of most doctors is purely an "anecdotal experience" and has limited or no scientific value.
I hope this information helps a bit.
Cheers
David
Australian Venom Research Unit
University of Melbourne
Parkville Vic 3010 AUSTRALIA
Gadgetgeek wrote:Good to know, as I have setopress bandages as my snakebite kit. I think their main advantage is size, not too many bandages large and long enough to be effective.
peregrinator wrote:On another aspect, Lophophaps asked about whether clothing in the area of the bite should be removed. That hasn't been answered thus far, but I recall reading somewhere that a patient's clothing may have collected some venom and is therefore useful as a means of species identification. Anyone have any knowledge about this?
Return to Bushwalking Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 58 guests