by sailfish » Wed 19 Sep, 2012 11:06 pm
Interesting that it's the opposite of a well known report done for NSW some years back. Well, the opposite until the report was officially released that is.
From the ABC link (above post):
"It found the most obvious explanation for reported sightings of big cats was that they were large feral domestic cats."
Feral cats that leave 8 cm wide paw prints, please.........
Regards,
Ken