Tas Tom wrote:I still reckon they should charge people for a helicopter evacuation
north-north-west wrote:Still going to take the *&^%$#! out of him, but.
matagi wrote:The TasPol statement is very poorly worded. "Symptoms of fatigue" could mean any number of things.
doogs wrote:You are never very far away too from a hut on a well marked track, and unless you are on the road - Vera section there's one downhill from your location. Could they have made it to the hut? Even in the dark it's easy enough to follow, and the long daylight hours at the moment mean this is unlikely to have been an issue.
north-north-west wrote:People do - or try to do - Frenchmans as a daywalk. I would not be surprised if they went in with just basic daywalk gear.
Of course, when TasPol say "Frenchmans Cap" it could be anywhere in the NP. Doesn't necessarily mean the summit area.
Tazz81 wrote:What people don’t seem to realise is that whenever POLAIR is sent to pick up someone who is “tired” or has a blister they are unable to attend to more “real” emergencies somewhere else.
The man's PLB was out-of-date, leading rescuers approximately 2 kilometres from his actual location.
South_Aussie_Hiker wrote:The man's PLB was out-of-date, leading rescuers approximately 2 kilometres from his actual location.
This is complete BS. That’s not how PLBs work.
headwerkn wrote:South_Aussie_Hiker wrote:The man's PLB was out-of-date, leading rescuers approximately 2 kilometres from his actual location.
This is complete BS. That’s not how PLBs work.
Yeah I'm curious about that statement. "Out of date" being weak battery or old style non-GPS unit? I thought the latter was no longer monitored.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 6 guests