sandym wrote: Even if you did manage to toss a rope over, ascend with prussics/jumars, that is not really fair means. Even peak baggers have ethics, right?
north-north-west wrote:sandym wrote: Even if you did manage to toss a rope over, ascend with prussics/jumars, that is not really fair means. Even peak baggers have ethics, right?
This is a weird comment. Peakbagging is peakbagging - you get up any way you can. The Tasmanian Peakbaggers' official criterion (from the lists put out by the HWC) is "You have to touch the very tippy top"; no more.
Warin wrote: So a parachute is ok... as is a helicopter ...
north-north-west wrote: Peakbagging is peakbagging - you get up any way you can. The Tasmanian Peakbaggers' official criterion (from the lists put out by the HWC) is "You have to touch the very tippy top"; no more. I know people who've carried folding ladders to get up the summit boulder on Mayson. It counts.
By your standards, no artifical assistance would be permitted, but how far do you take that? Permanent ladders? Tracks? Gloves and shoes?
sandym wrote:north-north-west wrote: Peakbagging is peakbagging - you get up any way you can. The Tasmanian Peakbaggers' official criterion (from the lists put out by the HWC) is "You have to touch the very tippy top"; no more. I know people who've carried folding ladders to get up the summit boulder on Mayson. It counts.
By your standards, no artifical assistance would be permitted, but how far do you take that? Permanent ladders? Tracks? Gloves and shoes?
Not everyone will define "peakbagging" as you get up anyway you can nor use the Tasmanian Peakbaggers criterion. If you used a ladder in some other countries/cultures you could be accused of cheating, even among "peakbaggers."
As a Dilbert reader, I can also easily recognise a false dichotomy.
north-north-west wrote:OK, exactly which aids do you consider to be acceptable, and which are not?
Warin wrote:north-north-west wrote:OK, exactly which aids do you consider to be acceptable, and which are not?
Would constructing steps in rock faces be 'acceptable'?
Say using a scutching tool... could even add an angle grinder...
north-north-west wrote:OK, exactly which aids do you consider to be acceptable, and which are not? And does that mean that, by your standards, no-one can claim to have peak-bagged Everest if they use what is considered to be standard equipment, procedures and assistance, such as ropes, oxygen, sherpas, etc? And why is carrying rope & ascenders or a ladder and using it on an otherwise unclimbable rock, "cheating"?
paul8 wrote:Hello everyone,
A group of us made it to the summit of Evans Crown.
Difficult climb !
But easy for us as we had help from 2 rock climbers.
They set up the ropes for us.
Here is my trip report and some interesting photos:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GQ182kOxEIIY2EFZ3C0rINpH1BnM2OpG/view?usp=sharing
Return to New South Wales & ACT
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests