Moondog55 wrote:True I'll save the money then as a PLB is way down on my list of needs ( but you may know my thoughts on that already) I think if I get into a situation where I need one I'll be well dead before the rescue arrives so no point at all in setting one off
Onestepmore wrote:I think probably the PLB, because without searchers notified and looking for him, he could tweet on his whistle or flash his strobe indefinitely, but with no one out there to hear or see it'd be fruitless.
GPSGuided wrote:Onestepmore wrote:I think probably the PLB, because without searchers notified and looking for him, he could tweet on his whistle or flash his strobe indefinitely, but with no one out there to hear or see it'd be fruitless.
I agree. In that article, I didn't get the impression that the strobe did much while the whistle was only of value when the rescuers got near. Yet, there's every possibility that the rescuer could have homed in on him using his PLB. In more general terms, I guess the strobe may be more valuable in an air rescue scenario while the whistle is to attract a ground party. Starting a fire/smoke signal may be even better if possible.
Moondog55 wrote:Given the original post I don't think I would be able to light a big signal fire in those conditions. And if I could then rescue wouldn't be needed, same goes for the situation in the second link.
Moondog55 wrote:True I'll save the money then as a PLB is way down on my list of needs ( but you may know my thoughts on that already) I think if I get into a situation where I need one I'll be well dead before the rescue arrives so no point at all in setting one off
baeurabasher wrote:Moondog55 wrote:True I'll save the money then as a PLB is way down on my list of needs ( but you may know my thoughts on that already) I think if I get into a situation where I need one I'll be well dead before the rescue arrives so no point at all in setting one off
This could be considered reckless behavior. If you had a stroke, or a broken leg, you could survive for hours/days before you died a painful death. In this time a helicopter could get to you. Still, if you value your life so little, why am i bothering to comment..... It's all up to each individual. I carry one for my families peace of mind if nothing else. I guess if i had no family worrying about me I may not bother either.
I dont think a SAR team would be too pleased with you either.
Moondog55 wrote:I could argue that while seatbelts have saved many lives they may inadvertently decreased the quality of the life they have saved in a number of instances. Rather be dead than a vegetable is all I am saying
GPSGuided wrote:Back to hypothermia. Can chocolate or other high caloric food, lots of it, push back hypothermia? Curious whether death by chocolate is better than hypothermic death?
wayno wrote:in NZ NO ONE EVER DIES FROM STARVATION in the mountains...
wayno wrote:dehydration doesnt kill people in nz. lack of water is never that big a problem
Return to Bushwalking Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 11 guests