corvus wrote:If you really must use drink bottles for Metho you could add a tiny drop of food dye to ensure you can separate them from drinking water, In the country I grew up in ( Scotland) Metho was dyed purple and back then could only be purchased from a pharmacy in small bottles.
We tend to forget that Metho can be deadly if ingested and also are possibly a bit cavalier in how we treat it,I personally would still use the dedicated metal fuel bottle if using a Metho burner regardless of the relatively small increased weight.
corvus
... you could add a tiny drop of food dye to ensure you can separate them from drinking water...
Rob A wrote: Why? Am I the only one with superhero powers that help them remember that the small bottle in the cookset that looks like nothing else carried is fuel? Or do you leave it lying around to be found by small children and apparently dim bushwalkers?
quicky wrote:Rob A wrote: Why? Am I the only one with superhero powers that help them remember that the small bottle in the cookset that looks like nothing else carried is fuel? Or do you leave it lying around to be found by small children and apparently dim bushwalkers?
hahaha. Nicely said. I think if someone finds their way into my cook kit that has a meths stove and lighter, to then pull out the little tiny bottle that both smells like fuel and tastes like fuel, with a label.....to then think it's anything but fuel??....they deserve it!
corvus wrote: Good point but what about the big bottles that are needed for extended walks ??
corvus wrote: Gas is so much more effective IMHO and is the only fuel permitted in Tasmania on a total fire ban day and having used Metho in the past the only stove I personally found it was really efficient in was the Multi fuel Optimus No 11 Explorer I own which at over 710 g sans fuel, it is and was overkill for two but at the time thought after experiencing very slow cook times with my Trangia especially in wintery conditions it was the way to go, several stoves and many years later I have found my perfect 4 season stove and it does not involve messy Metho.
corvus
vagrom wrote:80,000 views in 6 weeks. Clearly, there's something here worth bottling.
icefest wrote:I have only ever used PET bottles for storing metho.
After having some PET water bottles burst I only ever use bottles that originally had soft drink or soda water in them.
I also usually do some impact testing. I fill my (soon to be) fuel bottle with water and throw it at the ground a couple of times, if it doesn't burst you're good.
If the bottle starts looking really bad throw it out and get a new one, cheap and safer that way.
-icefest
Bubbalouie wrote:I hope you don't test helmets using the same methodology
icefest wrote:Isn't that the methodology that is used to test helmets (and safety stuff with cars)?
I thought crash tests were a common safety test :/
icefest wrote:That was not satire, nor trolling.
What you mean is that I should attempt a destructive test of the bottle, and if the bottle survives use another new but identical bottle?
That seems reasonable. I'll do that from now on.
icefest wrote:Where do you work? It sounds quite fun.
Bubbalouie wrote:icefest wrote:Where do you work? It sounds quite fun.
Software company is as specific as I'm willing to post online. Lots of engineers (software, electrical, electronic, mechatronic, mechanical, optical and mining) also a lot of geologists.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests