Nuts wrote:I'm thinking a simple effort, somewhere 2wd access, pleanty of room to spread out & camp (independently/quietly etc..), not any great distance to walk, minimal pressure..
photohiker wrote:Easy pickings: Visit the road accessible areas and do day treks from the vehicle with large empty packs
flyfisher wrote:photohiker wrote:Try not to lose them in the sea on the way down to Sandy Cape then
Do I detect sarcasm,..the wit of fools.
FF
Taurë-rana wrote:Just caught up on this discussion, it's certainly generating some high feelings! I'm torn because I have been through the whole area in a 4WD, and love it, and if I was still going regularly would hate to be shut out, although the escalation in bogan behaviour may have driven me away anyway.
I think the problem is that the horse has bolted though. If the area had been managed properly in the first place, if fines were actually applied to people caught doing the wrong thing, and alternative routes put in around middens etc, if there had been more education about the history, if Parks and the government had been more willing to work with the 4WD community to manage it so that there was a culture of working together to look after it and have pride in it we may not have this problem now. People consider it their land and that's why passions run so high. Lots of the more responsible 4 wheel drivers love it for its beauty and wildness as much as we do, but perhaps struggle to recognise the historical and cultural significance. I don't know what the answer is. You can't just lock people out of their home, and for all they abuse it, it is their home. It's no less our country just because we haven't been here 40,000 years, but it can't keep going like it is. Somehow attitudes need to change.
And as for mining and forestry
flyfisher wrote:photohiker wrote:Try not to lose them in the sea on the way down to Sandy Cape then
Do I detect sarcasm,..the wit of fools.
FF
Plenty of vehicles been washed into the sea down there, and a bulldozer buried on one of the beaches, disappeared into the jelly sand.
flyfisher wrote:Good point Corvus, a few pics and some rego nombers would jerk them into gear.
We do get sick of hearing stories about these morons and their poor behaviour.
Same old story, always a few people seem unable to behave in a decent manner.
It would be great to see a few hefty fines handed out and maybe vehicles impounded etc.
SBS, did any of your people think to take pics of these idiots. Would ge good, we all would like to know who and where from.
FF
flyfisher wrote:SBS, did any of your people think to take pics of these idiots. Would ge good, we all would like to know who and where from.
Disappointing. Can we have the discussion without personal attacks, please?geoskid wrote:No point asking ff, sbs has swallowed the green pill, (doctrine), and has no problem with ethics if it gets in the way of spinning his lines. It's blatantly obvious and disappointing..
stepbystep wrote:For those interested in the true, sustainable future of this region feel welcome to observe the Tarkine in forward motion. Trolls will be booted, this is a place for peaceful, creative, progressive people. The bushwalking potential is extraordinary
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1613061 ... 0/?fref=nf
You must log in to continue.
photohiker wrote:stepbystep wrote:For those interested in the true, sustainable future of this region feel welcome to observe the Tarkine in forward motion. Trolls will be booted, this is a place for peaceful, creative, progressive people. The bushwalking potential is extraordinary
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1613061 ... 0/?fref=nf
Not visible to non-members...You must log in to continue.
stepbystep wrote:The first results will be displayed in Sydney at the end of April. much more after that!
stepbystep wrote:I don't see any tar being splashed about buddy
What I did see at Easter was an ugly, aggressive, loud user group that intimidated many.
Grindelwalddave wrote:The Tasmanian government is about hand over 61,500 hectares of Tarkine reserves to mining speculators. These areas include sections of the Arthur Pieman Conservation Area, Meredith Ranges Regional Reserve, and Savage River Regional Reserve. Could regular contributors to this site proffer an opinion as to how this could affect bushwalking opportunities in the Tarkine?
north-north-west wrote:Where was your starting point, doogs? There's not really an obvious easier point of entry that I can see from looking at maps. (Not asking for detail, just a vague idea.)
Nuts wrote:The Meredith Range reserve access to be denied?
doogs wrote:I personally have no problem with mining, although at the moment with the drop in resource prices it is probably not a good investment for the state. In the future perhaps. However I do take umbrage at mining in Reserved lands, why bother setting it aside for protection? Instead of conservation we'll just remove the *&%$#! land, what a fantastic way to protect it!
stepbystep wrote:I took a policy some time ago of not engaging with some of the members on this forum so I won't directly.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests