jobell wrote: The only thing with most of my walks is that I usually can see where I'm putting my feet as I like my trails. I suspect from what I've read that this isn't much the case with the AAWT?
north-north-west wrote: But, technically - and please excuse my pedantry - AAWT posts really belong in the Victorian section. It was a Victorian initiative and the Victorian section is still the only bit that is taken seriously by the authorities.
Walk_fat boy_walk wrote:north-north-west wrote: But, technically - and please excuse my pedantry - AAWT posts really belong in the Victorian section. It was a Victorian initiative and the Victorian section is still the only bit that is taken seriously by the authorities.
Haha yes that's true.
OT a bit, but I have wondered before about whether, being a multi-state/territory walk, it might be useful to have a separate forum for AAWT posts (maybe under Local Track)? Just a thought... might be overkill.
GBW wrote:Who are these 'Authorities' of whom you speak NNW? Do you mean the guys with a handful of yellow triangles, a bag of nails and a hammer?
GPSGuided wrote:The latest models from Outdoor Research/S2S are really quite excellent.
Tortoise wrote:Jagungal - almost trodden on by another friend on the way down to O'Keefe's hut from the summit. 2 or 3 on the frost plains in the north. Nearly trod on 2 near Schlink Hilton during a hay fever attack. I'm more comfy having a bit more protection on my legs.
Btw I miss the baggy pants AWT signs.
Tortoise wrote:Btw I miss the baggy pants AWT signs.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest