GPSGuided wrote:You want to review the colour calibration of your computer/monitor and any output device used. Ideally, all should be in sync and then you'll get WYSIWYG.
tastrax wrote:Sounds like its time to learn QGIS and use open data to overlay the tracks etc onto the LIST map tiles. Then you can create maps at any scale you like, turn them into PDF and then print them at multiple scales
http://www.qgis.org/en/site/
http://listdata.thelist.tas.gov.au/opendata/
damoprz wrote:Apparently you can print maps on Tyvek now as well, though I'm not sure if you need a special printer.
CasualNerd wrote:Tyvek printing from officeworks works very well, quality is quite good and it's waterproof.
When you fold it though, the material bunches up a little in the fold and you lose a bit of detail, as the 'paper' is quite thick compared to normal paper.
jakeyarwood wrote:CasualNerd wrote:Tyvek printing from officeworks works very well, quality is quite good and it's waterproof.
When you fold it though, the material bunches up a little in the fold and you lose a bit of detail, as the 'paper' is quite thick compared to normal paper.
Thanks for the info. If and when I end up printing some maps on Tyvek I'll be sure to roll 'em instead of fold 'em!
Son of a Beach wrote:LIST Map's Topographic basemap is designed for screen and not paper, as far as I can tell. It is OK for printing, but I find that there is a lack of contrast and it's difficult to see the details sometimes, as it looks a bit washed out or feint.
tom_brennan wrote:I've written something for NSW maps to do the collation of tiles from a map server into a printable image. It's a work in progress, but allows you to select an A3 or A4 section of map, and have the tool download that section for you in hi-res PNG. Takes a while to run (in the background - so just be patient). Only tested on Google Chrome. Could easily be adapted for Tasmania.
CasualNerd wrote:Please go ahead and adapt it for Tasmania ! It's a very neat tool, thanks for sharing. I did see on facebook TheLIST online map data has just been updated too.
neilmny wrote:EPSG 28355 is correct for zone 55.
I've found that you can change the datum from WGS84 to GDA94 but wierd things happen if you change it directly to GDA94/MGA55 from WGS84. Once the map data is set up on GDA94 you can select the UTM datum/zone without any problems.
I might be doing it wrong but this works and a lot of tested coordinates come out correct.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 3 guests