Walk_fat boy_walk wrote:As of this morning there's now a bushfire on the lower slopes of Hannels, which can't be helping. Currently up to 40 ha according to fires near me.
puredingo wrote:According to the report I had read there had been 300 hundred people involved in this rescue mission.
From experienced bushwalking volunteers on the ground to extensive air support. But no mention of dogs? Which I agree would be ideal for such country.
This fire is absolutely devastating for the effort.
puredingo wrote:This is indeed an intriguing and perplexing case.
I mean, if it is his camp and camera, he's obviously moving around. Surely given the time he’s been missing even if he painstakingly inched his way through the scrub in a downward direction he would have hit the flats/river by now?
The report was he is an experienced bushwalker with youth on his side….dunno?
Puddle Duck wrote:I would've thought that an experienced bushwalker would stay in one place (assuming there's no immediate danger)
puredingo wrote:Surely given the time he’s been missing even if he painstakingly inched his way through the scrub in a downward direction he would have hit the flats/river by now?
Baeng72 wrote:Puddle Duck wrote:I would've thought that an experienced bushwalker would stay in one place (assuming there's no immediate danger)
No beacon, no tracking device that someone can follow and alert authorities to your location. It would be a long wait.
Baeng72 wrote:puredingo wrote:Surely given the time he’s been missing even if he painstakingly inched his way through the scrub in a downward direction he would have hit the flats/river by now?
If I'd just gotten lost in logs and scrub, I'd head to top of spur, knowing track wouldn't be far away.
After some time of not being able to find track, then finding water, and heading downhill would probably be the go.
north-north-west wrote:All of the "I'd do this/that/whatever" remarks ignore the possibility of injury. And once you get lost in sufficiently thick scrub, getting unlost is very hard work even with good landmarks nearby, and that process increases the likelihood of injury.
It's seldom just one thing going wrong in such cases. One little thing gets compounded by another one or two or three little things and the end result is an ex-walker.
puredingo wrote:Baeng72 wrote:Puddle Duck wrote:I would've thought that an experienced bushwalker would stay in one place (assuming there's no immediate danger)
No beacon, no tracking device that someone can follow and alert authorities to your location. It would be a long wait.
Well, yeah, ordinarily you would think that would be the case but the fact that the searchers have come across two of his sites means if he had of just stayed put he’d be found by now. Particularly the second one which was at a water source. But yeah, it’s all speculation. Maybe with the fires burning he feels like he has to keep moving? Hopefully it won’t be long before he can tell us exactly what went on.
Moondog55 wrote:Was found a short time ago.
More details probably tonite on the news
Return to Bushwalking Discussion