jtmiske wrote:As a female in my twenties, I remember being repeatedly lectured to "not engage in outdoor activities I was not experienced enough for and hence possibly waste resources in requiring rescue." Of course, accidents happen, but the point was that you can minimise your chances by being sufficiently experienced. I'm not hearing this point being made publicly in any of the reporting on the recent outdoor accidents. Except a little on this forum, which is refreshing, thank you. I'm concerned these sorts of incidents (between Christmas and early Jan this year in Tas and Kosi) will make tightening National Park restrictions even more restrictive.
I started bushwalking in my early teens, easy stuff, tracks, short distances, not much climbing, etc. Walking with an experienced leader and with others to advise me I learned. There were no rescues. I'm aware of children as young as 3-4 years-of-age doing short walks - and loving it. With suitable leadership and walk selection, age is no barrier.
Like many experienced bushwalkers I'm very conservative, erring on the side of safety with a number of options available if things turn a bit bad. A few years ago at Kosciuszko NP I was stuck for three nights while a blizzard whipped snow around the hut - in October!
There does not seem to be much that parks agencies and others can do to restrict bushwalkers. Enforcement costs would be prohibitive and impractical. There are simply too many access points at KNP to police. The spate of recent SAR operations may be a statistical outlier. It may be due to social media saying to do a certain walk with lovely sunny pictures. Never mind that in a few hours sunny can change to cold wet and windy. Never mind that the track is really a route and it can fade. Never mind that reliance on a phone for navigation and calling for help is not possible if the battery dies, the phone is lost or the phone breaks.